The structural departure for an overall system can take place in two fundamentally different ways: Bottom-Up and Top-Down. Both approaches have their specific applications and advantages and are used in different phases of system development.
Bottom-up approach
The bottom-up approach starts with the smallest components or building elements of a system and gradually adds their weights upwards to determine the total weight of the system. This approach is particularly useful when detailed information about the individual components is available and the total weight is to be calculated based on these details.
Steps in the bottom-up approach:
Identify components:
- Detailed analysisFirst, all individual components and elements of the system are identified and analyzed in detail.
- Weight measurementThe weight of each individual component is measured or calculated based on technical drawings and material data.
Form subsystems:
- GroupingThe individual components are grouped into subsystems based on their function or location in the system.
- Weight totalizationThe weight of the components within each subsystem is added together to determine the total weight of the subsystem.
System integration:
- Calculate total weightThe weights of the subsystems are added together to calculate the total weight of the system.
- Determining the center of gravityThe focal points of the subsystems and the entire system are determined in order to analyze the balance and stability.
Validation and optimization:
- ValidationThe calculated total weight is validated against the requirements and specifications of the system.
- OptimizationIf necessary, adjustments are made to optimize the weight and achieve the performance targets.
Advantages of the bottom-up approach:
- AccuracySince the weight is calculated based on detailed information about the individual components, the bottom-up approach is very accurate.
- Detailed analysisThis approach enables a detailed analysis of the individual components and subsystems, which leads to a better understanding of the system.
- FlexibilityChanges in the components can easily be taken into account by recalculating the weights.
Challenges of the bottom-up approach:
- ComplexityFor large and complex systems, the detailed analysis and weight calculation of all components can be time-consuming and complex.
- Data availabilityThis approach requires detailed information on all components, which may not be available in the early stages of development.
Top-down approach
The top-down approach starts with the overall weight of the system and breaks it down from top to bottom into the various components and subsystems. This approach is particularly useful in the early stages of system development, when the overall requirements are known but the details of the individual components are not yet fully defined.
Steps in the top-down approach:
Set total weight:
- Analyze requirementsFirst, the overall requirements for the system are analyzed, including performance, safety and efficiency targets.
- Determine total weightThe total weight of the system is determined based on these requirements.
Division into subsystems:
- Define system architectureThe architecture of the system is defined, including the main components and subsystems.
- Assign weight budgetsThe total weight is divided between the various subsystems. Weight budgets are set for each subsystem to ensure that the total weight is not exceeded.
Detailed breakdown:
- Define componentsEach subsystem is further subdivided into individual components. The weight budgets of the subsystems are allocated to the components.
- Specify requirementsDetailed requirements are specified for each component, including mass and performance targets.
Iteration and optimization:
- Iterate designDesign is iteratively adjusted to ensure weight budgets are met and performance targets are achieved.
- OptimizationOptimization techniques such as lightweight construction or material substitution are used to further reduce weight and improve performance.
Advantages of the top-down approach:
- Overall viewThe top-down approach enables a comprehensive view of the system and ensures that the overall requirements are met.
- Consistency: By defining weight budgets for subsystems and components, consistency is ensured throughout the entire system.
- Early fault detectionPotential problems can be identified at an early stage, as the total weight and distribution are taken into account from the outset.
Challenges of the top-down approach:
- Level of detailIn the early phases, the details of the individual components may not yet be fully known, which can lead to uncertainties.
- AdjustmentsChanges in the requirements or in the design can lead to adjustments in the weight distribution, which requires flexible planning.
Integration of both approaches
In practice, both approaches are often combined in order to utilize the advantages of both methods. In the early stages of development, the top-down approach can be used to determine the total weight and weight budgets for the subsystems. Once more detailed information about the components is available, the bottom-up approach can be used to calculate and validate the total weight based on the actual weights of the components.
By integrating both approaches, engineers can ensure that the system achieves performance, safety and efficiency targets while meeting overall weight requirements.
English 
Deutsch